While both machines are relatively light, the Cat model’s extra weight could provide a bit more stability and pushing and lifting power. The operating weight of the 289D3 is about 173 pounds more than that of the T770. It also provides a partial throttle capability for a smoother operation and reduced fuel consumption. The Cat product has an advanced Electronic Torque Management system that maximizes the power to the ground and keeps the engine from stalling during the most demanding digging and material handling tasks. The 289D3 and the T770 are both high-performing machines equipped with advanced features that optimize productivity and efficiency. Use the Mustang Cat Comparison Tool to compare our construction machinery with that of other popular competitor brands.Ĭompare Equipment with Our New Comparison Tool> Performance Our side-by-side comparison of these versatile machines can help you make an informed purchasing decision. If you’re seeking a CTL weighing approximately 10,000 pounds, the Cat 289D3 and the Bobcat T770 are two of the top models in this class. The low center of gravity also delivers more stability when working in treacherous underfoot conditions. The high-flotation rubber tracks enable the CTL to produce less ground pressure than its skid steer loader cousin. A compact track loader (CTL) is the perfect machine for performing various earthmoving tasks in confined areas where the footing and terrain are less than ideal.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |